Letter to Art III

The pattern of education when it comes to school is one of structure. A high school art class throws phrases at you like "composition", "elements of design", and "components of art". There is a quest for order and simple definitions, the breaking down of a finite machine into its levers and gears. If you wish to continue art into some capacity of your later life, it is important that you grasp the inadequecies of this perspective. It is a feeble mentality we must, by situation, humor and tolerate, but never buy into because, as artists, we know our work will never truly be subject to rubrics and numbers. That is not to say a methodical approach to art is without value; the greatest thing I have ever learned from my high school classes was to think through my work before and during production. As with anything in life, only a balance, between the deliberate and spontaneous, will yield beautiful work which preserves natural meaning. I simply ask that you not approach your art as the sum of a few parts which, if accumulated with proper precision, will create something of any significance. Evaluators and teachers must, to some degree, quantify our work to grade it, and certainly their input is usually valid and occasionally even instrumental in our development as artists. But an obsession with grades and a checklist of elements which define "good art" will only eclipse one of the greatest beliefs I have arrived at over the last few years; the most beautiful and wonderful things in this world are those which are created for their own sake.